This beauty is actually a tgirl...Leticia "Letty" Crawford. Unbelievable...
[
attachment=27769]
[attachment=27912]
(02 Feb 2018, 10:38 )Like Ra Wrote: [ -> ]Oohhhh brilliant! Moar!!! 😋
The first image is very suitable for the hypnosis thread 😉
Have you seen this just a boy that dresses like a girl..
https://smithbkelly.blogspot.com/2017/
I LOVE THOSE PANTYHOSE! I LOVE THE ENTIRE ENSEMBLE, THAT WAS MY THING...in 1970,s.
http://www.youtube.com/c/girlybritneysmith
Thursday, January 25, 2018
I Forgot where the THREAD is, Ra you were discussing some of the Youtube Stars are for theatrical purposes
Even if there is some nefarious scheme to create great web pages and videos for Transvestites...OMG I WISH THERE WAS IN 1984 When I Started indulging in Open Cross Dressing, I HAD LEFT ARKANSAS....TO SAN FRANCISCO! Fun Fun Fun...but No Literature!
Kinda controversial, possibly made up, "fake news", "propagandish", populist, but I wonder how gender neutral would be kids without the "social intervention"?
Source:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUrtD8BTjxY
How "gender neutral" were you?
Seriously, trying to find something "truly feminine" I started thread
Femininity. It turned out, that it's very difficult to divide feminine from masculine, IF you move the "social intervention" aside.
Pink is neither feminine, nor masculine (over the years it changed), long hair is neither feminine, nor masculine, dresses were worn by both boys and girls, high heels (not stilettos, of course) were "male prerogative", same goes for stockings, leggings, etc... Painted faces? All genders used to paint faces. Same goes for piercing, tattoo, bijouterie and jewellery.
That leaves some anatomical differences, chromosomes and reproductive roles... The rest is "society". In other words the intrasexual differences are more pronounced, than intersexual. Or ... do I miss anything?
DISCLAIMER: this is not to start a holy war. I'm trying to understand this logically with no propaganda from any side.
My take is simple. With all the buzz words and labels, it comes all down to this.
The female of almost all species, produce, carries the eggs and the child. Then feeds the child.
The male of almost all species furtelise the eggs of the female.
In the wild, the male is pretty. The female is dull and boring.
Example: Quack Quack.
Exactly, so most of the issues/problems/gender dysphorias are society induced.
There are exceptions. E.g. if a man would like to look like a woman, and does not accept his body. On the other hand, it's also a typical non-gender-related problem: one girl wants big boobs, another want small boobs. That's why we have plastic surgery.
Another thing I notice. The other day, a saw a few girls/females and a number of them have their hands behind their backs. Almost as if they wished their hands were tied somehow.
One girl kept her hands behind her back for almost a half an hour.
Hmm....