New donation goal

The site is hosted by Linode and costs $864 yearly.

Update Sep 2022:
– The Paypal account is linked to Linode
– The counter is being constantly updated (it will go up&down according to the donations and payments)
– The counter goal is set to $864
– Related forum thread: Donations and hosting payments

Update Apr 2021:
– backups are allowed for 160GB
the new goals are
– minimum 320GB storage + backup ($1150)
– plan upgrade + backup ($1500 – shown below)



Thanks much again to those who already donated!

$130

You can also support the site at no cost to you by using these links shopping:

Aliexpress or eBay

If you find the site interesting and, hopefully, useful, I would greatly appreciate if you could consider making a donation to keep it running. Our goal is $1500 (annually). Thank you for your help!

Related articles and threads:

34 thoughts on “New donation goal”

  1. I’ve read very bad reviews about HazeNET. Arvixe (I’m currently using) scored one of the best (if not the best). They offer excellent support, response time and uptime. The prices are quite high, though.

    But that does not mean that I’ve stopped looking around 😉

  2. Sure, will have a look. But do you know if it’s considered as a spy or a malware by search engines, web-proxies and antivirus software? Do not want to be blocked by half of the Internet. Took me years to shake off one ad-campaign residuals…

  3. I have it on my site and it’s clean… You might want to put an announcement if you do use it, so then people can “donate” by just leaving their computers on the web page… Some people do that for us, they just leave it on during work or at night.

  4. Maybe you could put up Flattr.com-buttons on the website too? I could sure click a dollar or two if needed. 🙂

  5. I’ve read about Flattr and was not impressed, to be honest. But I can try it, sure. Thanks for the suggestion!

  6. Cal ” wrote:

    Maybe you can give self-bondage advice for 5 bucks each.

    This contradicts the idea behind the site.

    BTW, the content is not showing up in Firefox.

  7. I’m always surprised by the resource requirements of this blog. I have 50,000-daily-active-user sites doing much more resource intensive work that use less. I have old phpBB forums with more posts and members than this one sharing resources with a dozen other sites on a 6 year old server. Perhaps if you switched from what’s probably Apache and mod_php to nginx and php-fpm…

    At least I’m glad you moved to Linode. They’re a good choice for VPS. I use them for development and staging servers.

  8. Dan ” wrote:

    I’m always surprised by the resource requirements of this blog.

    The problem is the disk which is shared by all VPSes. If the disk is abused by, for example, a backup, system installation or extensive swapping, all related VPSes suffer.

    See also this thread: /forum/mybb/showthread.php?tid=530

  9. Disk IO should never be a bottleneck for a small blog or forum… it’s not like you’re uploading gigabytes of new files every minute. Most requests should be served straight from memory with the MySQL query cache, OS disk cache, and PHP opcode cache (APC) keeping what’s needed there automatically.

  10. Dan ” wrote:

    Disk IO should never be a bottleneck for a small blog or forum…

    Sure, if it’s a standalone system. The site can survive a much higher load, if the disk load is normal. And at Arvixe the disk load was 100% even when the web-server was stopped. The whole story is in that forum thread (see above).

    Dan ” wrote:

    Most requests should be served straight from memory

    95% of the site is dynamic. With quite a few write operations (view counters, for example). Some side widgets are fully cached, some (e.g. 4 random images) are not.

    Dan ” wrote:

    the MySQL query cache,

    Yes, true. The DB is not that big (130 tables, 65MB for this site). But caching takes memory, right?

    Dan ” wrote:

    OS disk cache

    Yes, but cache takes memory.

    Dan ” wrote:

    APC

    It’s set up to 64MB. The hit rate is quite high, but spiders and rippers kill the caches.

    The available memory is only 1GB. If the disk is busy, apache processes accumulate in memory, what leads to swapping, swapping adds to the disk load, etc. I have a script which kills apache should the load reach a certain level. This is the only way to stop the “dead-lock”.

    I think 2GB RAM would solve the problem (not completely though, because of some rippers), but it takes money 😉

  11. If the disk is busy, apache processes accumulate in memory, what leads to swapping, swapping adds to the disk load, etc. I have a script which kills apache should the load reach a certain level. This is the only way to stop the “dead-lock”.

    That’s indicative of a misconfigured Apache. You should lower the MaxClients/MinSpareServers/MaxSpareServers/ServerLimit and KeepAliveTimeout directives. The solution is to not launch more Apache processes than you have memory for; not rely on disk swap to let you get away with it until there’s some load.

    Spiders/rippers shouldn’t be pushing anything out of an opcode cache. I doubt there’s 64MB in PHP code between the blog and the forum, so it should all be cached and your hit rate will be 100% (after the first few minutes).

    http://iron.awio.com/apc.php

  12. Dan ” wrote:

    MaxClients

    It is already 40.
    KeepAliveTimeout 3
    MinSpareServers 1
    MaxSpareServers 3

    Dan ” wrote:

    I doubt there’s 64MB in PHP code so it should all be cached and your hit rate will be 100%

    It also caches generated code for posts, etc (user cache). So, it’s bigger than 64MB.

    BTW, I need to upgrade APC. It’s a bit out of date.

    Actually, since I moved to Linode, I can’t complain. There were outages because of overload, but they are quite rare (in comparison to Arvixe).

    1 day, 6 hours and 12 minutes

    File Cache Information
    Cached Files 429 ( 51.4 MBytes)
    Hits 10943154
    Misses 1013789
    Request Rate (hits, misses) 109.92 cache requests/second
    Hit Rate 100.60 cache requests/second
    Miss Rate 9.32 cache requests/second
    Insert Rate 8.08 cache requests/second
    Cache full count 3329

    User Cache Information
    Cached Variables 4125 ( 8.1 MBytes)
    Hits 1002465
    Misses 680851
    Request Rate (hits, misses) 15.47 cache requests/second
    Hit Rate 9.22 cache requests/second
    Miss Rate 6.26 cache requests/second
    Insert Rate 12.43 cache requests/second
    Cache full count 1166

  13. All the techie stuff possted here has certainly put me off ever setting up any website of any sort. I have neither the time nor inclinatiion to learn what Apache, mod_php, nginx, vps or php-fpm are let alone how to deal with spiders and rippers.

  14. Culmor ” wrote:

    All the techie stuff possted here has certainly put me off ever setting up any website of any sort.

    This is actually a part of the fun. You can learn as much (and as deep) as you want. For example, nothing and simply ignore all issues. Just order a bigger server. Or simply use a free platform. like blogger or livejournal.

    On the other hand, you are right. It takes sooo much time with almost no end result, so you just want it to work with no extra dances and whistles.

  15. In this month i dont give you money because i dont found here no interesting posts (just say’n)

  16. Take a look at serverpronto.com, they have dedicated servers for like $40 a month with like 2gb ram. Also have you taken a look at cloudflare? It should bring the requests down ALOT!

  17. Brett diedrich ” wrote:

    Take a look at serverpronto.com, they have dedicated servers for like $40 a month with like 2gb ram.

    Pronto Dedicated 50$ 2GB 1x 3.2GHz AMD Athlon (2 cores) 1x 500GB 5TB traffic
    Linode VPS 40$ 2GB 2x 2GHz Intel Xeon E5-2630L (8 cores) 48GB 4TB traffic

    Mmm.. not sure…

    BTW, the reviews are not good.

  18. poorwhitetrash just snt $20.00 VIA PayPal

    email on Ebay different from Sign in here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *