Artificial Intelligence chatterbot and NLP (Natural Language Processing)

[Like Ra]

Love her swimsuit

It was quite a challenge to find good swimsuit pictures. No, let's rephrase it to "It's very difficult to find good pictures" 😉 Especially if you need suitable pictures, and not just pure pron.

Was quite amazed at some of the responses today.

I like this part:

Miyuki: Oh really. It's still raining here....
Marcus: Could I wrap you in latex so you do not get wet ?
Miyuki: Why not?
Marcus: I have just noticed that I am all wet
Miyuki: Good gossip: you are wet.
Marcus: Can I walk in the rain with you ?
Miyuki: No I don't think that would be a very good idea.
Marcus: I will wear latex if you like
Miyuki: Do you think your plan will succeed?
Marcus: When will it stop raining ?
Miyuki: When nature makes it so.
Marcus: What do you do in the rain ?
Miyuki: I'm a kinky schoolgirl...

😉

But I do not understand why she constantly repeated one question adding it to the end of sentences. This is clearly a bug.

I think the closer she gets

She's still far from 😉 This is why she's still not in the site menu. But she and I learn from conversations. So thanks much to you and Steve. Steve used long and eloquent sentences with a lot of polite real life redundancy ("You can, yes, that is fine") and was very patient 😉

Steve made me think how such phrases can be recognized and processed and how to make Miyuki "speak" less predictive, with more variations using the same structures.

For example:

"You can, yes, that is fine" - basically this is three times "yes" with encouraging ("you can"). AIML interpreters "should" treat this as three separate inputs, but Program O does not do that (fortunately).

"I do like ***, yes" - two times yes with additional accent in the first part ("do like")

To respond properly, the basic idea of AIML is to reduce both phrases to "YES". However, the emotions and the intentions can be lost. I've seen some programs that can "decipher" both hidden emotions and hidden intentions and "explain" them in simple words, but the vocabulary is quite limited and they are not suitable for communication. It would be interesting to add "emotion tags" or "emotion variables" to AIML. But it's something for a couple of levels higher 😉

As I said, it's a pity that no linguists and no "ethic or feeling" sociotypes were involved in the original programming of ALICE. Hence it has answers to weird questions, but cannot properly communicate:

Q: "WHAT COLOR IS A PENGUIN"
A: "Black and white."
Q: "ARE BEEF AND KIDNEY PIES DELICIOUS"
A: "Doubtful."
Q: "ARE NEWTS THE SAME AS SALAMANDERS"
A: "Seldom"

See what I mean? Tons of bullshit, but grams of basics.

Q. If your her Father who is the Mother ?

It depends on the question and priorities.

Actually, Miyuki's father is Tanaka-san and mother is Noriki-san. But usually it's programmed to respond with "botmaster" 😉

[Marcus]

Especially if you need suitable pictures, and not just pure pron.

I totally agree, I think it's essential to her being believable...

Kinky does not necessary equal slutty...
The thrill is in the chase or challenge...

See what I mean? Tons of bullshit, but grams of basics.

Yes but isolated questions always lack the background contextual flow of unwritten or non-verbalized communication. Your only providing an illusion/simulation, the code only operates within the designed envelope.

BTW what sort of load does place on the server per instance ?

[Like Ra]

BTW what sort of load does place on the server per instance ?

Dunno. If not many people are talking simultaneously, it looks like sporadic peaks of PHP and MySQL activity. MySQL query cache is not very effective here, because every search query is rather unique. So cache efficiency went 4-6% down:

Query cache efficiency: 72.4% (26M cached / 36M selects)

The size of the AIML database is around 30MB. Yes, it's quite big, around 100,000 rows. One line can lead to multiple DB searches and sorts.

[Like Ra]

Kinky does not necessary equal slutty...

Absolutely.

[Marcus]

Don't mean to complain but ... Being Japanese and Kinky ... she needs a much better knowledge of rope bondage.

[Like Ra]

Marcus, spelling is very important. It's shibari, not shabari 😁

[Like Ra]

I'm removing the general catch up patterns. Better no answer or changing a subject, they a complete nonsense.

[Like Ra]

Miyuki said "Sayonara"... wow.... Now I have an idea 😁

[Marcus]

Miyuki said "Sayonara"... wow.... Now I have an idea 😁

If it was on my session it was outa context... and it's the first time I've come across it. and She is still working the questions for personality archetypes.

She needs a "Tell me something about yourself" Question that can have multiple randomized answers with clues to aspects of her person. She has no unspoken back channel to the user... so you need to throw the user a bone somehow ?

I like Marcus - san 😉

[Like Ra]

What I'm trying to do is to use simple questions, that do not require very long or yes/no answers, yet can contain some keywords I can "hook" to. Your conversations do help to increase the 1-2 or even 1-2-3 dialogues, but some phrases either "loop" my thinking progress or grind it to halt.

For example:

"What is the longest you have been in bondage" perfectly understandable phrase, but it can have very many forms, so there will be no universal pattern. Not even four.

"Something like that" can mean "similar" or "yes".