02 Sep 2024, 17:11 (This post was last modified: 02 Sep 2024, 18:30 by Like Ra.)
(03 Aug 2024, 00:10 )Like Ra Wrote: Can be a coincidence, but I noticed, that I began to "stink", when I stopped taking Pueraria for a couple of weeks, and stopped stinking when started taking it again. Could be something else, but if it IS Pueraria, then WOW!
...
So... It's not just my imagination. My breast seriously increased in size, while I didn't want it to 🤣 Yet for some weird reasons I'm getting aroused by this. Hypnosis works?
Estradiol & some phytoestrogens [Pueraria Mirifica] will cause you to "stink" less like a cis male guy, agree. PM works more for some people concerning breast development, less for others (same is true for estradiol, but is stronger in all cases). I was on low dose estradiol before covid and have used PM to take the edge off occasionally since. With PM I find it is also good to take a 5-7 day break after every 4-5 weeks and then restart the cycle again.
I personally am extremely skeptical of physical breast enlargement via hypnosis (perhaps if it causes you to massage and play with them a lot it might be a bit beneficial?)..... as for that hypnosis report earlier in the thread....
Question, what happens as cis women age (depending on diet & up to a certain age before menopause at least)?
Especially with younger women, their breasts keep growing slowing with age unless pregnant, which will cause a growth boost.... so I'm not surprised that growth was found... the control groups may have also been small enough to per chance skew the results in the favour of one group - the hypnosis group in this case [has been quite a while since I read it] 🤷🏻♀️ .
(02 Sep 2024, 01:14 )Like Ra Wrote: So... It's not just my imagination. My breast seriously increased in size, while I didn't want it to 🤣 Yet for some weird reasons I'm getting aroused by this. Hypnosis works?
Oh... Sorry for not being clear.... I associate the growth of my breasts with pueraria (not hypno), and the arousal from having them with hypno (I think, CSS).
"According to current research, Anemone root extract is not typically associated with any direct effects on the breast, but studies suggest potential anti-cancer properties in certain Anemone species, which could theoretically be beneficial in combating breast cancer when used as a part of a comprehensive treatment plan; however, it's crucial to consult a healthcare professional before using Anemone root extract for any medical purpose due to its potential toxicity and lack of extensive clinical trials in this area".
Interesting, but a bit of caution. There is something about the (author unspecified) "blog" entry which screams my name is ChatGTP. The structure, the very redundant repetitions, the chosen use of modal verbs and adjectives and vague or noncommittal references and unqualified examples used all read like a ChatGTP text.
The blog is also on a web site which sells PM capsules/tablets in rather unusually high doses ... 2500mg & 6000mg per tablet and not as suggested in the blog "Many sources suggest a daily intake of 500 mg to 1000 mg, typically divided into two doses". [Post Edit: the blog dosage sounds sane to me, their product dosage does not. Those capsules/tablets must be huge.. or the packaging & product description has a "0" too many].
I'm by no means against the use of PM, but am cautious about a lot of the information found on the web.
PS When ChatGTP gets better at faking it, we're screwed.
O! That's why the article looked so strange to me...
I have much respect for the ability to recognise this. It will be a very useful ability in the future, and a skill that needs to be updated frequently.
OTOH, the AI stuff can make quite a good summary and a compilation of multiple articles. And AI-bots do have access to lots of scientific resources. However, everything needs to be checked manually. Fortunately, you can ask ChatGPT to provide links to the resources.
