Femininity

[Like Ra]

And no, it's not "mannerism"....

[Like Ra]

Mmmm... I would add the 0.7 ratio (waist/hips, bust/waist). Very anatomicoanthropological, but still very feminine.

Are you saying that a 0.7 is the middle ?
Now it looks like you just set a standard.

I'm beginning to see a sealed can with a label saying...

Worms

[Like Ra]

There were several investigations and experiments where people had to choose the figure they like the most. And in most of the cases the waist/hips ratio was 0.7 for women and 0.9 for men. For example, the classic 90-60-90 is an example of the 0.7 ratio.

BTW, I posted a link to the site where you can play with various parameters. Here it is once again: http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten.../index.htm

Your talking cm, not inches. Right?
Ok, 0.9 would be male, and 0.7 would be female.
So, with that being said, 0.8 could be male or female or netural.
Right?

[Like Ra]

Your talking cm, not inches. Right?

For 90-60-90? Yes, cm.

0.8 could be male or female or neutral.

Neutral? Or androgynous? Possibly.

[Like Ra]

So, with that being said, 0.8 could be male or female or netural.

Just measured: at 94-80 (and sometimes 78) I'm pretty close to 0.8 😉 To "fit" into 0.8, my waist should be 75, provided the hips will not "shrink" as well. Funny fetish mathematics 😁

[Like Ra]

So far the most objective feminine traits are:

o- waist/hips ratio = 0.7
o- keeping knees together
o- keeping elbows close to the body

Anything else?

[Like Ra]

To illustrate my point. Have a look at the elbows, knees and feet:

                       

By strange coincidence I stumbled across this 100 year old Punch cartoon and thought it very apt for the subject of physical stance:

   

MJ