Femininity

[Like Ra]

And no, it's not "mannerism"....

[Like Ra]

Mmmm... I would add the 0.7 ratio (waist/hips, bust/waist). Very anatomicoanthropological, but still very feminine.

[Tinker D]

Are you saying that a 0.7 is the middle ?
Now it looks like you just set a standard.

I'm beginning to see a sealed can with a label saying...

Worms

[Like Ra]

There were several investigations and experiments where people had to choose the figure they like the most. And in most of the cases the waist/hips ratio was 0.7 for women and 0.9 for men. For example, the classic 90-60-90 is an example of the 0.7 ratio.

BTW, I posted a link to the site where you can play with various parameters. Here it is once again: http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten.../index.htm

[Tinker D]

Your talking cm, not inches. Right?
Ok, 0.9 would be male, and 0.7 would be female.
So, with that being said, 0.8 could be male or female or netural.
Right?

[Like Ra]

Your talking cm, not inches. Right?

For 90-60-90? Yes, cm.

0.8 could be male or female or neutral.

Neutral? Or androgynous? Possibly.

[Like Ra]

So, with that being said, 0.8 could be male or female or netural.

Just measured: at 94-80 (and sometimes 78) I'm pretty close to 0.8 😉 To "fit" into 0.8, my waist should be 75, provided the hips will not "shrink" as well. Funny fetish mathematics 😁

[Like Ra]

So far the most objective feminine traits are:

o- waist/hips ratio = 0.7
o- keeping knees together
o- keeping elbows close to the body

Anything else?

[Like Ra]

To illustrate my point. Have a look at the elbows, knees and feet:

                       

[madjack]

By strange coincidence I stumbled across this 100 year old Punch cartoon and thought it very apt for the subject of physical stance:

   

MJ