(28 Jun 2020, 00:56 )Like Ra Wrote: So, the two sentences are not quite related logically
It's hard to tell as there is 27 seconds missing between the two clips.
That being said, I re-listened to the two clips, and i found that the audio tracks I listed need to be taken a little loose.
On the re-listen, Clip #1's "Primary Voice #2" does not have the same inflection, cadence, or volume level as "Primary Voice #2" on clip #2. If going by cadence / inflection, the voice track of the "If you pay for your session" and "against a stone wall" do match more closely with each other than they do with the other tracks, but the volume does seem to increase for the 'stone wall' part in the second clip.
Overall, I think @
rolandmc 's hypothesis might be plausible, as I can't see the logic in including the stone wall phrasing without being related to people who don't pay for sessions.
Edit : After thinking it through more thoroughly, using inflection and cadence in my argument doesn't make much sense as the script is voiced by a TTS program. I believe any inflection and cadence I heard is imagined / projected during the process of separating the different voice tracks from each other. That being said, I do believe the different voice tracks can by differentiated by timings in the overlap, combined with the relative volume of the phrase itself. The volume I think is the key in determining the primary, secondary, tertiary etc. tracks used to create the files.
