When is fashion a fetish? (Or fetish a fashion?)
[
attachment=50718] - interesting 'opposites' from the recent 'Met gala' I'm genuinely torn between the 'almost nothing' attire and the 'nothing to see here' approach from Kim (or is it her? How can you tell?)
It appears Ms Kardashian has developed a 'thing' for covering up - this is pure fetish (in my mind at least)
[
attachment=50717] - again, we must assume it's KK under the leather, it could be anyone!
Enjoy
MJ
MJ, you just beat me to Kim K!
[
attachment=50719]
I much prefer her bronze rubber coat-with-attached-gloves though.
This is a brave statement.
Quote:It appears Ms Kardashian has developed a 'thing' for covering up - this is pure fetish (in my mind at least)
My Op-ed but I confess I've never really appreciated the early 'Atomage' heavy leather/rubber thing. I appreciate there wasn't a lot of choice at the time but what there was all seemed to look really 'clunky' (for want of a better word), nothing ever seemed to fit properly.
Compare Cathy Gale's leathers to Mrs Peel's, 1963 and 1965
(I think), they're a world apart.
[
attachment=50745]
botched or not fully healed plastic surgery that requires covering up?? 😉