(04 Mar 2022, 20:15 )Like Ra Wrote: (04 Mar 2022, 13:12 )Penguin Wrote: Georgi Zhukov.
Who sacrificed millions of Soviet people for pretty much nothing.
A good comprehensive history of Eastern Front WWII is liable to tell you otherwise.
Zhukov was a royal PITA to serve under.
But the aforesaid millions would have been thrown into the furnace by absolutely anybody else prosecuting a major piece of that war for the USSR, no matter how competent they were.
Bottom line is, the Red Army, 24 hours before the kickoff of Barbarossa (June 22),
did not have the skills necessary to successfully wage war against a first-rate opponent.
What they had to do, instead, was grow those skills, while fighting a major existential war on their own soil at the same time. That's expensive, and most of the cost is in lives.
They weren't even on a par with the Wehrmacht by July 1943 (Kursk). But by that time, the odds were no longer even. And they could, and did, plan a defensive battle very very well: Zitadelle was a

eady operationally bankrupt when Hitler finally turned it off between July 13 and July 17.
It would take another year (Operation Bagration) before the Red Army could demonstrably beat the Wehrmacht at it's own game: combined arms maneuver warfare.
(04 Mar 2022, 20:15 )Like Ra Wrote: (04 Mar 2022, 13:12 )Penguin Wrote: And some idiot (or succession of idiots)
That's the result of total mediocracy, impunity and mandatory selection of idiots (because idiots can be manipulated much easier)
You could be right about that one. That's certainly what Stalin did, until reality hit him upside the head with a 2x4 in 1941.
But the funny thing is, Gorbachev and the senior people who came up through the Party at around the same time he did were mostly sponsored by another bloodless sociopathic KGB bastard, Yuri Andropov,
who turned Stalin's selection criteria upside down.
Andropov selected his proteges for competence.
So it's not that Putin doesn't know how to get this right. He's seen it done right, himself.