Login

Max515 · 10 Feb 2025, 07:41

(09 Feb 2025, 23:10 )Like Ra Wrote:
(09 Feb 2025, 02:15 )dhf7b8g Wrote: I'm using Stash which I found recently.
... downloading ...
. . .
... scanning ...

We all know what that means: The entire internet knows your sexual fantasies.

***Like Ra*** · 10 Feb 2025, 16:34

(10 Feb 2025, 07:41 )Max515 Wrote: The entire internet knows your sexual fantasies.

But now you have a chance to see it by yourself 🤣

Stash works, but I can't say it's very useful. I got almost 400 pages of thumbnails, with just several files per page. So to find anything, you have to keep clicking, and clicking, and clicking ....

Max515 · 10 Feb 2025, 17:13

If you want a gallery (web based), I can recommend Single File PHP Gallery, but it groups images/videos as they are on the filesystem (by directory), it doesn't sort or index anything.

https://sye.dk/sfpg/

***Like Ra*** · (This post was last modified: 10 Feb 2025, 19:39 by Like Ra.)

(10 Feb 2025, 17:13 )Max515 Wrote: but it groups images/videos as they are on the filesystem (by directory)

So, they are a

eady grouped. What's the point, then? To create thumbnails?

***Like Ra*** · (This post was last modified: 10 Feb 2025, 19:44 by Like Ra.)

Are there any autotaggers/autosorters/autogroupers? Or local neural-network analyzers?

A couple of examples.

Digikam (https://www.digikam.org/) can discover/recognize faces, things, GPS locations.

QNAP NASes (app Qmagic) can do the same and even use AI-coprocessors.

dhf7b8g · 10 Feb 2025, 23:55

(10 Feb 2025, 16:34 )Like Ra Wrote: Stash works, but I can't say it's very useful. I got almost 400 pages of thumbnails, with just several files per page. So to find anything, you have to keep clicking, and clicking, and clicking ....

Yeah I have basically ignored the individual image functionality and I will continue to, I just sort them into galleries and tag those. Definitely don't have the time nor motivation to tag individual images. Sadly I don't think any auto tagger models work very well with kink content so I doubt results would be very good other than general concepts but it is something worth looking into to make that page actually useful.

***Like Ra*** · 11 Feb 2025, 03:16

It was about videos, not images - I disabled image scanning. And still, I got 400 pages...

dhf7b8g · 12 Feb 2025, 00:10

(11 Feb 2025, 03:16 )Like Ra Wrote: It was about videos, not images - I disabled image scanning. And still, I got 400 pages...

Ah I see. Good luck tagging 16k videos Shok

***Like Ra*** · 12 Feb 2025, 00:51

(12 Feb 2025, 00:10 )dhf7b8g Wrote: Good luck tagging 16k videos

... exactly ... hence, useless for me.

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me