AI images of African MILFs and old ladies in lycra

[Like Ra]

If thanks/likes does not mean anything, why do you count them.

I did not say "thanks" do not mean anything. I said, that the amount of thanks does not prove any (of the above) points.

Thanks have several functions:
- they encourage the poster to post more
- they show the appreciation of the audience
- they allow the minimum possible reaction, which otherwise would not appear
- they are meaningless reactions absorber
- they show what content is popular
- some people follow the ratings and "click" on links, because it's placed high in the rank
- statistics and graphs are cool!

Why do you count views ?

- they show the appreciation of the audience
- they show what content is popular
- some people follow the ratings and "click" on links, because it's placed high in the rank
- they correlate with the Google click statistics
- the show the popularity of the forum to potential advertisers
- they show if newly added threads/fetishes attract attention
- statistics and graphs are cool!

that pics are big NO.

That's exactly what I've heard/seen about men in pantyhose! Hundreds times!

Are you OK with killing people in computer games?

And thanks for bringing points and arguments! That's exactly what makes discussions interesting and meaningful! Even without any "thanks"! This is how we learn and evolve!

[Like Ra]

I bet pretty much nobody clicked the link above. So, hotlinking the image from the linked blog post:

[Like Ra]

Why do you count views ?

- they show the appreciation of the audience
- they show what content is popular
- some people follow the ratings and "click" on links, because it's placed high in the rank
- they correlate with the Google click statistics
- the show the popularity of the forum to potential advertisers
- they show if newly added threads/fetishes attract attention
- statistics and graphs are cool!

The funny thing is, I can list the same amount of points against the counters 🤣

[Like Ra]

what is next here ?

Short answer: "Nobody knows!"
Longer answer: "We live in a world of probabilities, in a 3D world of desires. Some things are more probable than others, the probabilities change with the time - a crouch we use in the 3D world to partially substitute "cause & effect" in higher dimensions, where time does not exist".
Practical answer:"Do you dare to create forum rules?"

Question about counting thanks/likes was retoric 😉


Men in pantyhose is not violence.  OK, for some peopel is, kind of.
You can allways create almost real AI image where someone hold razer blade near to your crotch while you are forced to put  pantyhose on.

But, do we know some real situation when and where this happen on a massive scale  ? No.

There are women who have imagination to be raped, but in the real world  are they "asking to be really raped" ?  I don't think so.

That is why I am against  pics that are connected with FGM by any means.

"....And thanks for bringing points and arguments! That's exactly what makes discussions interesting and meaningful! Even without any "thanks"! This is how we learn and evolve! ..."

I was wondering when you are going to write this 🍻

[Like Ra]

I was wondering when you are going to write this 🍻

😂 👍

[Like Ra]

violence

There are women who have imagination to be raped, but in the real world  are they "asking to be really raped" ?  I don't think so.

Bingo! Hence: computer games, drawings, novels, fiction, action and horror films, dolls, doujins, mangas, AI created images!

violence

There are women who have imagination to be raped, but in the real world  are they "asking to be really raped" ?  I don't think so.

Bingo! Hence: computer games, drawings, novels, fiction, action and horror films, dolls, doujins, mangas, AI created images!

Exactly this!

@Vixien
Just because the scope of worldwide FGM is different, doesn't make it different from rape or snuff fetish, as a source of inspiration for fictional fetish material.
We could argue that realworld FGM is more toxic, harmful and insidious in a society than say....rape....but that's no reason to ban it as source of inspiration. Literally tons of books & film in which FGM occurs and for which I could argue, could be "abused" as fetish material. But then we would have to dismiss the concept of catharsis entirely.
Just some examples: 
The secret of Joy - book by Alice Walker
Gangreen - book by Jef Geerearts
God's Sandbox - movie
AntiChrist - movie

Bottomline; I still say your arguments hold no water.

All things considered though, and since I am not an unreasonable person: I have adjusted the posts containing these pictures in spoiler tags, for the sake of forum sanity and goodwill to compromise. So, don't like it, don't click on it. Simple.

Yes, but ...as I said so many times...too real, to much pointing to something violent and the fiction is on second place. I don't think that we shoul'd have that here.