AI images of African MILFs and old ladies in lycra

[MIWSTIUS]

Sorry , I can't accept that

"...Subject of the series is about beautiful Lycra swimsuit ladies about to be circumcised..."

Pardon me, but you'll have to elaborate on your reasoning for me to understand your objection.

[Vixien]

As far as I know, nowadays there is no forced physical castration anywhere (ok, maybe in the case of pedophilia and the like). FGM is just that and these AI pictures strongly allude to it. It is quite clear why FGM is done just as in other cultures or religions women are put as a second. Men first, than woman. NO !
No matter that these pictures are not braking any law (as @Like Ra said)  I just can't say "not my cup of tea"  .

[MIWSTIUS]

 I just can't say "not my cup of tea"  .

Then you're probably better off, avoiding this thread altogether - because Ra certainly won't end it.


This kind of discussion is what makes the AI topic so interesting
because it's all fake/staged imagery, while looking quite convincing and real - in regards to a subject matter that is truly abhorrent IRL.

But this goes for so many other terrible realworld things, portrayed in books, film, art and online media.
FGM has been going on for literally a thousand years if not longer, still prevalent throughout the entire world. 
Even us westerners took part in FGM up until the Victorian era (Dr. Isaac Baker Brown and the Kellogg's cornflakes man) - heck, I think I read somewhere it was  still used as "treatment" in 1960's psychiatric insitutes.  

If I take this subject as a core component to a visualized orgasm denial fantasy, it's not going to change
that realworld situation for better or worse.
Same goes for any fiction involving rape, snuff, enslavery, beastiality etc. All of which involve involuntary victims - yet all of that
makes its way as subject matter into forms of visually narrative expression.

I promise I'll never make it gory or portrayal of minors etc. It's purely fantasy orgasm denial/submissive stuff combined with my
Lycra fetish.

[Vixien]

 I just can't say "not my cup of tea"  .

Then you're probably better off, avoiding this thread altogether - because Ra certainly won't end it.


This kind of discussion is what makes the AI topic so interesting
because it's all fake/staged imagery, while looking quite convincing and real - in regards to a subject matter that is truly abhorrent IRL.

But this goes for so many other terrible realworld things, portrayed in books, film, art and online media.
FGM has been going on for literally a thousand years if not longer, still prevalent throughout the entire world. 
Even us westerners took part in FGM up until the Victorian era (Dr. Isaac Baker Brown and the Kellogg's cornflakes man) - heck, I think I read somewhere it was  still used as "treatment" in 1960's psychiatric insitutes.  

If I take this subject as a core component to a visualized orgasm denial fantasy, it's not going to change
that realworld situation for better or worse.
Same goes for any fiction involving rape, snuff, enslavery, beastiality etc. All of which involve involuntary victims - yet all of that
makes its way as subject matter into forms of visually narrative expression.

I promise I'll never make it gory or portrayal of minors etc. It's purely fantasy orgasm denial/submissive stuff combined with my
Lycra fetish.

No, I can't just avoid this.  I wrote "nowdays"  not mentioned  Victorian era, or 1960...  
I'm not saying that you support FGM , but that images strongly pointed to FGM and justify it through "fiction".   Once again, I'm not saying that you are doing that. 

"...If I take this subject as a core component to a visualized orgasm denial fantasy, it's not going to change
that real world situation for better or worse...."  Wrong.  Since you have posted it here (public) , it can change real world situation, like everything else.  Everything around us have influence, one way or another. 

And please, don't use @Like Ra  opinion as excuse.

[MIWSTIUS]

 I wrote "nowdays"  not mentioned  Victorian era, or 1960...  

And I wrote " FGM has been going on for literally a thousand years if not longer, still prevalent throughout the entire world. "

I'm not saying that you support FGM , but that images strongly pointed to FGM and justify it through "fiction".   Once again, I'm not saying that you are doing that. 

And yet you say that I do by extension of the images, so you contradict yourself.

 Wrong.  Since you have posted it here (public) , it can change real world situation

Oh please, such nonsense. If you're truly concerned about FGM, you should go do something about the ones who are advocating and defending it in real life. But yeah, that requires a bit more than being an online keyboard warrior.

And please, don't use @Like Ra  opinion as excuse.

I'm not using him as excuse. I'm simply saying he seems unlikely to end the thread or delete the images.

[Vixien]

To cut long story short....

How many Thanks/Likes that pictures have ?

You don't need to answer.

EOD.

[Like Ra]

How many Thanks/Likes that pictures have ?

That's a "million flies" question 😅, which does not prove any point.

And please, don't use @Like Ra opinion as an excuse.

I'm not using him as an excuse. I'm simply saying he seems unlikely to end the thread or delete the images.

I generally do not delete posts, I usually shuffle them between threads.

As for this thread in particular, I will definitely keep it, because it resurrected the old discussions on what should be allowed. I will not link them here, and will try to make another take on it.

Let's define the issues (please correct me if I'm wrong):

- Fetish X is wrong/disgusting, hence it must be banned and forgotten (aka, "kink shaming")
- Fetish X contains illegal parts, hence it must not be discussed (aka, "public discussion censoring")
- Fetish X contains illegal parts, hence no related artificial materials (texts, drawings, AI generated images) should be produced (aka "fantasy censoring")

Sounds about right?

Following this logic, all detective novels, action films, historic materials must be banned and burnt down, because they contain detailed description or depiction of illegal activities.

[Vixien]

Do we have picture of forced circumcision of the man ?
Do we have pictures wher someone masturbating (male/female) watching an infant ?
Do we have pictures of sex with real animal ?
Etc....

All of that may be someones fiction or real thing....

[Like Ra]

Do we have pictures

With some help from neural networks it's possible now. Just like computer games made "killing" possible. And without any real harm to real humans or animals.

[Vixien]

I ment, do we have such picutres here, on the forum ? NO !

You know, this looks like when you want to convince flat Earthers that Earth is not flat, or that Russian guy that aggresion on UKR is wrong.

My point is very simple. Such kind of pictures strongly allude to FGM. Even in situation that I have never heard about FGM, that pics are big NO. Face expression + razer balde are horrifying. Lycra or ages may not be excuse, because what is next here ?


BTW, If thanks/likes does not mean anything, why do you count them. Why do you count views ?

Notthing more to add...