+- Like Ra's Naughty Forum (https://www.likera.com/forum/mybb)
+-- Forum: Self-Bondage (https://www.likera.com/forum/mybb/Forum-Self-Bondage)
+--- Forum: Self-Bondage Techniques (https://www.likera.com/forum/mybb/Forum-Self-Bondage-Techniques)
+--- Thread: Spread-eagle self-bondage using tights (US=pantyhose) (/Thread-Spread-eagle-self-bondage-using-tights-US-pantyhose)
RE: Spreadeagle using tights (US=pantyhose) - binaryfreedom - 11 Apr 2009
To make it more inescapable, perhaps after inserting one arm, tie it off using rope/bondage tape/leather cuffs?
RE: Spreadeagle using tights (US=pantyhose) - Like Ra - 12 Apr 2009
(11 Apr 2009, 21:38 )binaryfreedom Wrote: To make it more inescapable, perhaps after inserting one arm, tie it off using rope/bondage tape/leather cuffs?
Hmmm... Interesting point... It depends on how you insert arms, right? If you fully insert one arm then the second - that will definitely work. A loop of sticky should be enough.
Thanks!
RE: Spreadeagle using tights (US=pantyhose) - madjack - 28 Jun 2009
I've got some 'free' (ahem!) time coming up - so am going to give this a real go.
Have decided to use the ice and padlock/ring release method - though will do a 'dry-run' first ('cause I don't want to spend a week tied up!)
My plan isn't for a spreadeagle tie, but rather a kneeling 'arms behind your back' session. I intend to tie the tights lengthways across the bed, with the 'top/head' end higher. I'll use ropes or straps around my legs, with maybe some more around my torso and off to both sides to prevent any side to side tipping/movement.
I'll be positioned under the stretched tights and hope to be able to slide my arms (one per 'leg') into them. Ideally I could also get my head into legs going to the 'top' of the bed as well.
Hopefully I'll have some pictures to share (or a tale to tell) in a few weeks time.
Suggestions on improvements or comments on something I've missed appreciated!
MJ
RE: Spreadeagle using tights (US=pantyhose) - Like Ra - 01 Jul 2009
Not sure if I completely understand the plan. Are you saying that there will be two pairs of tights? One pair for arms and one for the head?
Anyway, good luck!
RE: Spreadeagle using tights (US=pantyhose) - binaryfreedom - 06 Jul 2009
didnt work for me at all. I tried multiple times with two pantyhose. Maybe the pantyhose is too big or stretchy or something. But basically i could reach the knots from where I was everytime. eventually I came up with this plan to tie one end to a corner in the closet, and another end to the door knob of my bedroom. I could still reach the knots, so I used my foot to close the door. Now I am no longer able to reach the end knots -- but because the pantyhose is stretched, I can pull my arm out easily like how i pull out of a sweater -- essentially hold on to one end and pull one arm out.
RE: Spreadeagle using tights (US=pantyhose) - Like Ra - 06 Jul 2009
You can either use knots you can not untie, or use the "padlocks and ice" method: http://www.likera.com/sb/time/ice-ph1.php
RE: Spreadeagle using tights (US=pantyhose) - lycraerik - 06 Jul 2009
I would realy like to see this explained with pictures or a drawing
RE: Spreadeagle using tights (US=pantyhose) - binaryfreedom - 07 Jul 2009
finally got stuck lol. had to bring the pantyhose all they way so it encased the front of my shoulders. i did this by using a swimming motion. Then when i tried to pull my arms out, basically I was pulling my shoulders with me and no way to pull it out. pantyhose very stretchy so I could touch all my body parts (including undoing nipple clamps easily).
RE: Spreadeagle using tights (US=pantyhose) - Like Ra - 07 Jul 2009
(07 Jul 2009, 08:09 )binaryfreedom Wrote: finally got stuck lol. had to bring the pantyhose all they way so it encased the front of my shoulders.Yes, you have to wear pantyhose as a jacket, or rather a "bolero".
(07 Jul 2009, 08:09 )binaryfreedom Wrote: pantyhose very stretchy so I could touch all my body parts (including undoing nipple clamps easily).
What about the thickness? I think 70+ den would be less stretchy and more constrictive. Also you can try several layers.
Straitjacket using tights (remake of the spreadeagle technique) - Joyl27 - 22 Dec 2009
I don't know whether LikeRa has a
eady documented this, but this technique can be easily transformed into a straitjacket by tying the feet of the tights together (not to a pole), then wearing it as in the spreadeagle technique (i.e. push your arms all the way into the legs of the pantyhose, and pull the crotchpiece behind your neck) and arms crossed, pulling the loop down through your head so that the knot ends up at your backside.The inverse way (hands cross behind your back, as in here) is far more interesting:
After inserting your arms and pulling the crotchpiece behind your neck, step through the loop in order to get your hands behind your back in the shape of the Japanese-style arm-binder. Then pull your right hand to the front, push your left foot (or both if they're bound together) through the loop (so that the part of the tights that extends from your fingers goes on top of your left foot), and when you've got the knee through, push your right foot through too, and then just wiggle the loop up to your waist in order to get the knot to your frontside while your arms are firmly tied behind your back. As far as I know, your feet cannot be bound to stationary objects if you want to do this. The less slack you have in the tights, the tighter it will feel against your waist and the more difficult this position is to get into and out.
I don't use escape mechanisms in this, i.e. the knot is a plain reef knot. Escaping is just a matter of dexterity and struggle to do the binding moves in reverse. (Heh, maybe one day I find myself in this. Let's hope not.)
Because the knot is on the opposite side than the hands, it is impossible to attempt to undo the knot while being bound, unless you've got really dexterous toes 😊
If you have your arms in the front, I count at least three different ways to escape (and two ways to don it as well). Arms behind your back, there is however only one way that I know.