Like Ra's Naughty Forum
Chastity The good! & The bad! - Printable Version

+- Like Ra's Naughty Forum (https://www.likera.com/forum/mybb)
+-- Forum: Bondage (https://www.likera.com/forum/mybb/Forum-Bondage)
+--- Forum: Plugs, vibrators, watersport and chastity toys (https://www.likera.com/forum/mybb/Forum-Plugs-vibrators-watersport-and-chastity-toys)
+--- Thread: Chastity The good! & The bad! (/Thread-Chastity-The-good-The-bad)



RE: Chastity The good! & The bad! - McKinleyZonker - 22 Jul 2026

(22 Jul 2026, 19:17 )Like Ra Wrote:
(22 Jul 2026, 18:31 )Tinker D Wrote: So, a vagina plug, inserted that expands just inside with a shield covering the entrance would prevent sex from happening.
Sounds like the same idea as a locking butt-plug.

I recall SteelWerks (in Canada) had a bespoke insertable device that attached to the labia (and locked) via a series of piercings.


RE: Chastity The good! & The bad! - Tinker D - 22 Jul 2026

Well, I’m pretty sure that there are a lot of women out there are interested in chastity without poking holes in their pussy.

It’s just that I don’t believe that I have ever seen anything like I described.


RE: Chastity The good! & The bad! - Culmor - 23 Jul 2026

Out of interest I tried both my new chastity devices under my pink rubber Ola dress as my old CB6000s left a very unsatisfactory bulge.

Loose women 3.jpg thumbnail   

And the result was, there's nothing to choose in visibility, only the lock shows with both styles. I find the flat style very slightly more comfortable though. It might be more about the curved ring than the catheter lengths though.

Experiment.JPG thumbnail   


RE: Chastity The good! & The bad! - Like Ra - 23 Jul 2026

(23 Jul 2026, 12:06 )Culmor Wrote: a very unsatisfactory bulge
I would still recommend this design: https://www.likera.com/forum/mybb/Thread-Chastity-The-good-The-bad?pid=87123#pid87123


RE: Chastity The good! & The bad! - Like Ra - 01 Aug 2026

This thread has reached 300K (302,000) views!


RE: Chastity The good! & The bad! - madjack - 02 Aug 2026

This one is for @Tinker D, who asked to see more of my successes and failures - this one is currently a 'failure'.....


Screenshot 2026-08-02 174025.jpg thumbnail    Screenshot 2026-08-02 174054.jpg thumbnail    Screenshot 2026-08-02 174119.jpg thumbnail   

It was the 'double-lock' that appealed to me - part of my fetish is 'over-the-top' bondage/restraints (why use 6ft of rope when you can use 60 or 600!). The idea of locking two parts of a cage in place had a serious appeal and I thought it would make un-authorised removal even more difficult. 

So, I ordered the short version with a 43mm 'ring' size, as 40mm is usually fine and I can manage 38mm with lube and patience. 

The ring went on ok, as did the short cage, but there was no way and I mean NO WAY the 'gate' would close over the 'neck' of my testicles. 

Anyone familiar with how bloodless castration works on livestock will understand how trying to close that last bit of plastic! And I have NO desire to be castrated, no desire at all, no fantasy, nothing! So the damn thing was consigned to the furthest depths of my most difficult to access toy box. 

However, now I've found better images of this cage, I think I know what went wrong - the ring size also governs the gap between the gate (or is that a bar?) and the ring. If you look there is much wider gap with the larger size. It seems obvious now, but at the time the picture showing the rings and gates/bars wasn't online (or I didn't see it).

Next steps? I'm seriously thinking of trying again but with the 52mm sized ring and a medium cage (the small will still fit, so I'll have both). 

Wish me luck

MJ