26 Jun 2025, 00:28
Hi.
I'm looking for a specific type of male underwear. It should exist, but I can't find any. Maybe I don't know how to search.
So, this is what I'm looking for:
- underwear for men
- preferably thong, but briefs is acceptable, boxers are not.
- has a cockring that keeps the balls "in front", in a pouch, separated from the rest of the body
- the pouch continues up with a "tube" that keeps the penis in a vertical position, close to the body, not a detached "sheath/sleeve"
The closest I could find was this thong bodysuit:
https://vi.aliexpress.com/item/4000264053554.html
It's not available anymore. I bought one a few years ago and I can still see the product page from the link above, but I'm not sure you can see it too.
It does a good job of keeping it up, but there is no ring, not really, just a hole in the fabric. It's not tight enought and sometimes the balls slip back inside. And it's a bodysuit - I can't wear it unless it's winter, cold, and I'm going outdoors.
Currently available on ali are "separation pouch boxers". Just search "separation underwear" on ali - there are hundreds of results.
I bought one of these and I don't like them. While the waist band is tight, the rest of the fabric is very thin, weak and loose. It doesn't keep it up. Also, there is no ring. There is a hole and tube for the penis, but no separated pouch for the balls. The balls stay "inside", like normal underwear.
I also tried some "underwear", if it can be called that, with several adjustable "straps" to keep the penis up. There is no pouch, there is no fabric covering anything, the straps are uncomfortable, the penis slips down from under the straps when not erect.
There's also briefs, thongs and boxers with cockrings on ebay from a brand called "Svenjoyment". They call it "swell function". I bought a thong. It only has the pouch, but no vertical tube. The ring is better / tighter than my bodysuit, but it's still just fabric, with some edge stitching, but no metal or rubber ring.
Have you seen what I'm looking for anywhere?
Thanks.
I'm looking for a specific type of male underwear. It should exist, but I can't find any. Maybe I don't know how to search.
So, this is what I'm looking for:
- underwear for men
- preferably thong, but briefs is acceptable, boxers are not.
- has a cockring that keeps the balls "in front", in a pouch, separated from the rest of the body
- the pouch continues up with a "tube" that keeps the penis in a vertical position, close to the body, not a detached "sheath/sleeve"
The closest I could find was this thong bodysuit:
https://vi.aliexpress.com/item/4000264053554.html
It's not available anymore. I bought one a few years ago and I can still see the product page from the link above, but I'm not sure you can see it too.
It does a good job of keeping it up, but there is no ring, not really, just a hole in the fabric. It's not tight enought and sometimes the balls slip back inside. And it's a bodysuit - I can't wear it unless it's winter, cold, and I'm going outdoors.
Currently available on ali are "separation pouch boxers". Just search "separation underwear" on ali - there are hundreds of results.
I bought one of these and I don't like them. While the waist band is tight, the rest of the fabric is very thin, weak and loose. It doesn't keep it up. Also, there is no ring. There is a hole and tube for the penis, but no separated pouch for the balls. The balls stay "inside", like normal underwear.
I also tried some "underwear", if it can be called that, with several adjustable "straps" to keep the penis up. There is no pouch, there is no fabric covering anything, the straps are uncomfortable, the penis slips down from under the straps when not erect.
There's also briefs, thongs and boxers with cockrings on ebay from a brand called "Svenjoyment". They call it "swell function". I bought a thong. It only has the pouch, but no vertical tube. The ring is better / tighter than my bodysuit, but it's still just fabric, with some edge stitching, but no metal or rubber ring.
Have you seen what I'm looking for anywhere?
Thanks.