(04 Jun 2019, 17:04 )Standard Wrote: is there any free access to them

(04 Jun 2019, 17:24 )Like Ra Wrote:

(04 Jun 2019, 17:04 )Standard Wrote: is there any free access to them

RetroShare 😁 https://www.likera.com/forum/mybb/showthread.php?tid=2540
Also Youtube and Bitchute 😉

And welcome to the forum!

(04 Jun 2019, 18:05 )Standard Wrote: Have aeady visited 8ch, downloaded the RS and registered but still failed to get SB’s file. I am not good at this stuff   so sad.

Quote:More than half of the recent stuff just recycles old files no longer sold on the site listing it as new content under a new file name. For example, a 2013 file was word for word across all channels exactly the same as one of the 2018 releases. Although that was a bit extreme, usually in 2018 the copying / recycling only took bits and pieces from 5 to 8 different old files and then released it as a new file.

(06 Mar 2019, 22:42 )Like Ra Wrote: Another new (but longer) video.

Scarlett Johansson Ted Talk

8chan Anon Wrote:I'm aware of the "forced" fetish. Honestly it's not too dissimilar to the fetishes for being a submissive, humiliation, findom, cuckold, etc. fetishes. Basically for whatever reason the person has a kink for someone else controlling them in some fashion. Often these desires for being controlled is found in people who have to spend their entire lives being in control and wanting a release from that tension.

My issue with SB, in particular and a couple others as well, however isn't that the files attempt to force change. It's that they attempt to do so without even the knowledge of the listener.

For example with SB, prior to my (rather long at this point) campaign of file content awareness almost everyone was not even aware of the various tricks found in those files. This is not simply someone pandering to the forced fetish but someone deliberately trying to force without consent.

To put it into your own fetish, it would be like a dom trying to enter into a relationship with a sub but without the subs willingness or even any desire of being a sub. And I can't think of a single ethical dom in the world who respects a dom who randomly kidnaps strangers just out of pure luck of being at a specific place and time then forces them into becoming subs. Yet that is exactly what SB's files basically did for years before I made people aware of exactly what was in some of those files.

For a long time on their various websites files like SB's Penis Enlargement were not classified as feminisation or sissy material but rather as straight content. It is only recently, after I started publicly exposing the file contents, that SB moved them to their proper category.

'Maybe' no one truly undesiring of being changed was effected. But if even one person was then that is just completely unethical and wrong. Furthermore, in most of their files of this nature SB does not put in any kind of disclaimers in case of accidental access of a file by an unintended party. As someone who was taught many of the same psychological techniques that SB uses I find this reprehensible.

8chan Anon Wrote:I have nothing against feminisation. Personally explored cross-dressing as a kid and imagined myself as a woman. Put plainly I see nothing wrong with wanting to be a different gender or files that help you to obtain that life goal.

What I do have an aversion to, is files that attempt this via trickery rather than clarity. Files that attempt to allow oneself to raise your acceptance of own desires or affirmation that you can be the person you want to be are perfectly healthy in my opinion. But files that take a desire to date with women and / or have sex with them and use that to instead turn you into a female who will have sex with guys is just unethical unless the listener requested that very change. And that is where SB and a few other 'tists fall into my bad graces. Using one natural desire (ie a need for companionship) to instill something not natural to that specific person which (ie changing gender role perspectives) they have never previously shown a desire for is just unethical.

Let me summarize it by saying this. Someone comes into your office wanting to gain self acceptance of their desire for feminisation in some form is one thing, but someone else simply wanting to save their failing marriage and making them dress up and have sex with guys to 'feel closer' without any prior desire for such things is a completely other.

As for personal preference, I personally believe that hypnotists that attempt to solve problems rather than create new ones are the best hypnotists. No prior knowledge in regards to the Unicorn person you first mentioned there in your question. As such it is hard to make a sight unseen judgment. But, no, I am not a personal fan of IV. I honestly feel that a lot of her work isn't hypnotism at all. So if they truly share similarities then I doubt I would prefer them.