(29 Mar 2022, 16:01 )saffi_t Wrote: Psychology teaches hypnosis cannot make you do anything you don't want it to do.

(29 Mar 2022, 16:01 )saffi_t Wrote:

(29 Mar 2022, 09:55 )GCRhoads Wrote:

(28 Mar 2022, 18:00 )saffi_t Wrote:

(28 Mar 2022, 13:42 )Like Ra Wrote:

(28 Mar 2022, 07:53 )GCRhoads Wrote: As a straight man, this is not what I want to think about.

Just listen more, and you will. This is the idea 😉

(28 Mar 2022, 07:53 )GCRhoads Wrote: If SB indicated which sessions did or did not contain such gayification suggestions

This is the idea. You do not know what's in, and at the same time you do know what might be in, because it's SB.

I know I used to think like this, but isn't it more fun to submit and accept it.  Maybe this is bless feminine fun speaking in my head right now, but I am excited to be more and more turned on by hunky men.  Just thinking about it is making my pleasure center excited.  I have taken psychology classes in college and all of them say the same thing.

To each his own.  This is definitely not what I want.

Then you have two choices the "You take the blue pill—the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill—you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes."

In other words, do what you want, it's your choice.  If your mind rejects that from SB then it won't happen.  Psychology teaches hypnosis cannot make you do anything you don't want it to do.  I at least learned this in Psychology class in college.

(31 Mar 2022, 08:28 )GCRhoads Wrote: Who is going to spend $40 or $50 on a file when regardless of description, there is say a 95% chance the file will contain suggestions that the person doesn't want?

Samantha Bandler Wrote:Yes, Penis Enlargement does not increase the size of your penis... it increases the size of your Desire for Penis. Perhaps I should have been more specific in the session description?

That is a big question in my mind. Should I describe exactly what my sessions do in all possible detail? Should I say it has background music, hypnotic whispers, trance conditioning chimes, back-masked subliminals, and binaural beats?

Or is it good enough to say it is an interesting experience you will enjoy?

Samantha in Control 01 says nothing about the content of the session and it is very popular. So is Samantha in Control 02. The sessions that deal with sissy themes and above all cock sucking are the best sellers. Why is that? Is it that cock suckers are happy to pay for adventures?
Or is it that cock suckers are so much better off financially that $40 is nothing to them.

(31 Mar 2022, 08:28 )GCRhoads Wrote: Some people seem to be missing my point.  SB said something to the effect of "How can I market files to straight guys better?"  My answer is to mention when a file contains gayification suggestions that a straight person is not going to want.  Who is going to spend $40 or $50 on a file when regardless of description, there is say a 95% chance the file will contain suggestions that the person doesn't want?

My comments were not intended as a criticism of people with other preferences.  We all have our own sexual preferences and fetishes, and I am not going to denigrate somebody else's wants simply because it differs from mine.

(31 Mar 2022, 18:18 )saffi_t Wrote:

(31 Mar 2022, 08:28 )GCRhoads Wrote: Some people seem to be missing my point.  SB said something to the effect of "How can I market files to straight guys better?"  My answer is to mention when a file contains gayification suggestions that a straight person is not going to want.  Who is going to spend $40 or $50 on a file when regardless of description, there is say a 95% chance the file will contain suggestions that the person doesn't want?

My comments were not intended as a criticism of people with other preferences.  We all have our own sexual preferences and fetishes, and I am not going to denigrate somebody else's wants simply because it differs from mine.

This is the same thing that has always been said about her/his hypnosis.  It is the reason some choose not to listen.  Its also the reason some do choose.  I used to be the same way.

(03 Apr 2022, 14:40 )Flow Wrote:

(31 Mar 2022, 18:18 )saffi_t Wrote:

(31 Mar 2022, 08:28 )GCRhoads Wrote: Some people seem to be missing my point.  SB said something to the effect of "How can I market files to straight guys better?"  My answer is to mention when a file contains gayification suggestions that a straight person is not going to want.  Who is going to spend $40 or $50 on a file when regardless of description, there is say a 95% chance the file will contain suggestions that the person doesn't want?

My comments were not intended as a criticism of people with other preferences.  We all have our own sexual preferences and fetishes, and I am not going to denigrate somebody else's wants simply because it differs from mine.

This is the same thing that has always been said about her/his hypnosis.  It is the reason some choose not to listen.  Its also the reason some do choose.  I used to be the same way.

Which is why the facebook auntie politics that have crept into the files in recent years are a no-no. If the verbal ambiguity and suggestions concern sexuality, I'm on board. I mean, kink-wise it's easy to work out what the deal is on the website, and that's part of the contract in this sub-genre of erotic hypnosis. But if the files are being used to circulate someone's political views (whatever they may be) then it's a jolt, and an obvious deal-breaker.

(03 Apr 2022, 14:40 )Flow Wrote:

(31 Mar 2022, 18:18 )saffi_t Wrote:

(31 Mar 2022, 08:28 )GCRhoads Wrote: Some people seem to be missing my point.  SB said something to the effect of "How can I market files to straight guys better?"  My answer is to mention when a file contains gayification suggestions that a straight person is not going to want.  Who is going to spend $40 or $50 on a file when regardless of description, there is say a 95% chance the file will contain suggestions that the person doesn't want?

My comments were not intended as a criticism of people with other preferences.  We all have our own sexual preferences and fetishes, and I am not going to denigrate somebody else's wants simply because it differs from mine.

This is the same thing that has always been said about her/his hypnosis.  It is the reason some choose not to listen.  Its also the reason some do choose.  I used to be the same way.

Which is why the facebook auntie politics that have crept into the files in recent years are a no-no. If the verbal ambiguity and suggestions concern sexuality, I'm on board. I mean, kink-wise it's easy to work out what the deal is on the website, and that's part of the contract in this sub-genre of erotic hypnosis. But if the files are being used to circulate someone's political views (whatever they may be) then it's a jolt, and an obvious deal-breaker.

Show Content

Spoiler








I’ve had a hypnosis kink for as long as I can remember, and to this day I have mostly played via audio & video files.

I began listening to SB files some 10 years ago. I remember my first listen feeling so much more effective than any of the other file-induced states I had ever experienced. I remember that potency feeling thrilling.

…Actually, I remember it feeling terrifying! I recall writing my first email to SB in my first few months of listening. I felt I was still in a suggestible state. My hands were trembling, my heart was racing, I was sweating all over.

That first email response a decade back was met with a nearly immediate reply. The reply turned me off from listening again for at least a year. Okay, at least a few months.

So there I was, following the instructions from the recording: I had written a short email professing my desire to submit. Hours later came the reply: “Now that I’ve got your secret,” the email read, “You have to do whatever I say.” It took me right out of trance with a bad taste in my mouth.

In retrospect, I’m not really sure what I was expecting from an email reply, but I was so new to hypnokink and still quite ashamed of anyone finding out about it, that I had aeady quickly exited any states of suggestibility and hadn’t budged time or energy for what SB was apparently proposing: a slow, back-and-forth blackmail play session.

And the email was so thoroughly “in character” that I didn’t feel I could exactly respond by saying ‘Sorry, there, er, what did you say I should call you? Yes, Master. Sorry there Master, but uhm, I’m actually not that into this particular fantasy just this moment. But let’s maybe try something entirely different next week?” So instead I just didn’t reply.

(31 Mar 2022, 10:36 )Like Ra Wrote:

(31 Mar 2022, 08:28 )GCRhoads Wrote: Who is going to spend $40 or $50 on a file when regardless of description, there is say a 95% chance the file will contain suggestions that the person doesn't want?

SB aeady replied to it:

(06 Apr 2022, 19:55 )9795103903 Wrote: I have been lurking here anonymously for years and have been following these recent conversations. I'd like to share my own experiences with SB
. . .

(07 Apr 2022, 08:35 )GCRhoads Wrote: Another way that SB is unethical is SB is really a man pretending to be a woman.