+- Like Ra's Naughty Forum (https://www.likera.com/forum/mybb)
+-- Forum: Fetishes, obsessions, traits, features, peculiarities (https://www.likera.com/forum/mybb/Forum-Fetishes-obsessions-traits-features-peculiarities)
+--- Forum: Latex (https://www.likera.com/forum/mybb/Forum-Latex)
+--- Thread: Celebrities in latex (/Thread-Celebrities-in-latex)
RE: Celebrities in latex - Like Ra - 11 Oct 2023
More photos here:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12608387/Big-Brother-AJ-Odudu-racy-latex-catsuit-launch-show.html
And more links:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tv/24331815/aj-odudu-big-brother-launch-catsuit/
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tv/24330705/big-brother-aj-odudu-stuns-latex-catsuit/
(Yes, I know, it's The Sun 😂)
RE: Celebrities in latex - Culmor - 11 Oct 2023
Quote:(Yes, I know, it's The Sun 😂)But The Sun is what it is, it doesn't claim moral superiority like the Mail does.
RE: Celebrities in latex - Like Ra - 11 Oct 2023
(11 Oct 2023, 23:00 )Culmor Wrote: it doesn't claim moral superiority like the Mail does.Did I miss something in that Aj Odudu DailyMail article? Let me reread ...
RE: Celebrities in latex - Culmor - 11 Oct 2023
(11 Oct 2023, 23:02 )Like Ra Wrote:Read the comments. I doubt they'd have been so negative if she was a tad paler.(11 Oct 2023, 23:00 )Culmor Wrote: it doesn't claim moral superiority like the Mail does.Did I miss something in that Aj Odudu DailyMail article? Let me reread ...
RE: Celebrities in latex - Like Ra - 11 Oct 2023
(11 Oct 2023, 23:10 )Culmor Wrote: Read the comments.Comments can be nasty everywhere. I've just checked some comments on a quite reputable Dutch news site (nu.nl) and ... paint me disappointed in the humanity... Can't complain about the articles, though.
BTW, I don't even see the comments...
Edit: ahhh... the scripts are turned off for DM 😆
RE: Celebrities in latex - no smile - 12 Oct 2023
(11 Oct 2023, 22:43 )Like Ra Wrote:(11 Oct 2023, 22:33 )no smile Wrote: Wow, so you think it’s good to promote such bad journalism just because there is some nice photo? Coming from someone so attached to studies and fact…Are you talking about this particular article, this particular journalist, the photograph, the genre, the media, the organization behind?
I'm talking about the article with photos (also, behind the scene ones) and video, and some comments on what's going on. As I said, not all interesting photos are reposted here, so having a link to the article is useful.
If you know about much more reputable sites with such photos, please post them here 😉
I don’t know, there was no link and didn’t want to search it.
I don’t care about the photo. If I can prevent clicking on an article, even on the high rank, of a journal which don’t care about doing their job properly,  that will show me other, probably bad made article with some pub that will grant them money, and ask me some time to sort things they should have done right…Â
And about the more reputable ones, well, not much, but as said by @Culmor, there are some hiding their shit pretending being a good journal and some who simple don’t care. At least, those are clear on the matter.
And to end, yes, there are some good blog about latex in everyday wear, like https://www.wearlatex.com but they are not posting a lot
Edit : aaaah, I should stop quoting on iPad, it messes the code…
RE: Celebrities in latex - Like Ra - 12 Oct 2023
(12 Oct 2023, 08:09 )no smile Wrote: I don’t know, there was no link and didn’t want to search it.There was, there is 😊 But since you did not see it, I "assume" your comment about "bad journalism" is a general one.
(12 Oct 2023, 08:09 )no smile Wrote: I don’t care about the photo.This thread is all about photos. So, my understanding is that we should post photos/videos and/or links to the sources, no?
(12 Oct 2023, 08:09 )no smile Wrote: show me other, probably bad made article with some pub that will grant them money, and ask me some time to sort things they should have done right…ÂTo be honest, I don't understand what you mean here. Who asks you to sort what things? I thought, it's just as simple as "click", "look at the pictures", "enjoy", "done". I'm all for the best content, the best journalism, and the best comments, but usually you can't have everything.
(12 Oct 2023, 08:09 )no smile Wrote: Edit : aaaah, I should stop quoting on iPad, it messes the code…Looks like it's a bug in MyBB editor which interprets the timestamp as a phone number. I wonder if it can be disabled somehow... Anyway, the codes are fixed.
RE: Celebrities in latex - no smile - 13 Oct 2023
(12 Oct 2023, 09:34 )Like Ra Wrote:(12 Oct 2023, 08:09 )no smile Wrote: I don’t know, there was no link and didn’t want to search it.There was, there is 😊 But since you did not see it, I "assume" your comment about "bad journalism" is a general one.
Well, at the time of my post, Culmor had removed the link and you re-added it after so no, there was no link at the time and my comment was just following @Culmor own response about why the link was removed...
(12 Oct 2023, 09:34 )Like Ra Wrote:Yes, but it's you who always insist about uploading them on the forum.  Why the sudden change of opinion?(12 Oct 2023, 08:09 )no smile Wrote: I don’t care about the photo.This thread is all about photos. So, my understanding is that we should post photos/videos and/or links to the sources, no?
(12 Oct 2023, 09:34 )Like Ra Wrote:(12 Oct 2023, 08:09 )no smile Wrote: show me other, probably bad made article with some pub that will grant them money, and ask me some time to sort things they should have done right…To be honest, I don't understand what you mean here. Who asks you to sort what things? I thought, it's just as simple as "click", "look at the pictures", "enjoy", "done". I'm all for the best content, the best journalism, and the best comments, but usually you can't have everything.
Imagine we where talking about some clearly clickbait site, I would prefer avoid allowing them even the small amount of money they would get from the pub they'll show me. Â Furthermore if it's for a business who hide behind journalism.
Also, if a website show me some information that might important, I like to check the source if I find it important. Â And, or I have to think about sorting that information out if the it's not a serious one.
(12 Oct 2023, 09:34 )Like Ra Wrote: Looks like it's a bug in MyBB editor which interprets the timestamp as a phone number. I wonder if it can be disabled somehow... Anyway, the codes are fixed.
As always, fast and good work. Â Thanks
RE: Celebrities in latex - Like Ra - 13 Oct 2023
(13 Oct 2023, 19:07 )no smile Wrote: you re-added it after soNo, I did not.
(13 Oct 2023, 19:07 )no smile Wrote: Yes, but it's you who always insist about uploading them on the forum. Â Why the sudden change of opinion?Because not all photos were uploaded and I always encourage adding the source.
(13 Oct 2023, 19:07 )no smile Wrote: Imagine we where talking about some clearly clickbait site, I would prefer avoid allowing them even the small amount of money they would get from the pub they'll show me. ÂYes, fully agree here.
RE: Celebrities in latex - Like Ra - 14 Oct 2023
I hope this site is acceptable: https://people.com/jenna-lyons-compares-herself-to-giant-sex-toy-after-covering-latex-bodysuit-in-lube-8356327
Jenna Lyons in a latex leotard/swimsuit/bodysuit
How did she manage to keep her pants dry?
Video by jennalyonsnyc [Clp1X0Op3NP].mp4 (Size: 20.81 MB )
https://www.instagram.com/reel/Clp1X0Op3NP
Video by jennalyonsnyc [Clp2OGvOoSC].mp4 (Size: 2.8 MB )
https://www.instagram.com/reel/Clp2OGvOoSC