![]() |
Pantyhose encasement - Printable Version +- Like Ra's Naughty Forum (https://www.likera.com/forum/mybb) +-- Forum: Fetishes, obsessions, traits, features, peculiarities (https://www.likera.com/forum/mybb/Forum-Fetishes-obsessions-traits-features-peculiarities) +--- Forum: Pantyhose & stockings (https://www.likera.com/forum/mybb/Forum-Pantyhose-stockings) +--- Thread: Pantyhose encasement (/Thread-Pantyhose-encasement) |
RE: Pantyhose encasement - Like Ra - 20 Apr 2025 (20 Apr 2025, 08:58 )Culmor Wrote: No, to me sheer spotted nylon always makes the wearer look like they have a skin condition 😁Not a fan of classy polka-dot? 😉 RE: Pantyhose encasement - Vixien - 20 Apr 2025 (20 Apr 2025, 09:38 )Culmor Wrote: Not a method I've seen before but I imagine it's an interesting feeling to wear. No danger of the dreaded bare midriff either. This is very interesting usage of belts and nylons RE: Pantyhose encasement - Like Ra - 23 Apr 2025 Not encasement, but ... interesting clothes ... It is NL on the photo. ![]() RE: Pantyhose encasement - madjack - 14 May 2025 Is AI generated imagery art? I'm not sure what to class these as, but they are quite interesting: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() They are wonderful fantasies of 'perfect' nylon encasement, though in some way less appealing because of their perfection? I think, to me at least, the appeal of real encasement is that I know it's achievable, with all the laddered tights, squashed noses, wrinkles and seams, and that under that nylon there's a real person who (I hope) is enjoying the experience. The AI stuff, though amazing, lacks that element of reality and is too perfect, too unachievable... Either way - Enjoy MJ RE: Pantyhose encasement - Like Ra - 14 May 2025 (14 May 2025, 07:55 )madjack Wrote: They are wonderful fantasies of 'perfect' nylon encasement, though in some way less appealing because of their perfection?Good point... But... think of all the ads... They are real, but edited to perfection, way far from the reality, and too unachievable 😅 RE: Pantyhose encasement - madjack - 15 May 2025 (14 May 2025, 11:23 )Like Ra Wrote:(14 May 2025, 07:55 )madjack Wrote: They are wonderful fantasies of 'perfect' nylon encasement, though in some way less appealing because of their perfection?Good point... But... think of all the ads... They are real, but edited to perfection, way far from the reality, and too unachievable 😅 I have a memory of when HD movie technology first started to be used and that various actors/actresses were horrified by the details of their faces it revealed - pores, hairs, etc. Maybe the soft focus of a stocking over the lens still has its merits? MJ RE: Pantyhose encasement - Like Ra - 15 May 2025 (15 May 2025, 07:59 )madjack Wrote: I have a memory of when HD movie technology first started to be used and that various actors/actresses were horrified by the details of their faces it revealed - pores, hairs, etc.Yes! That was a revolution! Funny, it does not look HD anymore. Has the brain adapted? (14 May 2025, 07:55 )madjack Wrote: too perfect, too unachievableOTOH, think Korean surgery... (15 May 2025, 07:59 )madjack Wrote: Maybe the soft focus of a stocking over the lens still has its merits?I used this technique when I was shooting with SLRs! You have a huge choice of filters! Think black polyamide stocking, white lycra stocking, flesh/tan... And the results are clearly different. What an excuse to always carry a bunch of hosiery with you 😅 RE: Pantyhose encasement - madjack - 16 May 2025 Friday fun day with real encasement: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Enjoy MJ |