![]() |
|
Tier / Iceberg chart by creator - Printable Version +- Like Ra's Naughty Forum (https://www.likera.com/forum/mybb) +-- Forum: Fetishes, obsessions, traits, features, peculiarities (https://www.likera.com/forum/mybb/Forum-Fetishes-obsessions-traits-features-peculiarities) +--- Forum: Hypnosis and Hypno-fetish (https://www.likera.com/forum/mybb/Forum-Hypnosis-and-Hypno-fetish) +--- Thread: Tier / Iceberg chart by creator (/Thread-Tier-Iceberg-chart-by-creator) |
RE: Tier / Iceberg chart by creator - jocelyn_oui - 08 Dec 2025 (08 Dec 2025, 20:35 )giggly_unit Wrote:(08 Dec 2025, 20:01 )jocelyn_oui Wrote: I don't think a newb should handle ... Uh - arbiter? Nobody. People vote, there is a distribution of results. They get collated. Data can be shared with everybody so they can see the ranges, etc. But yes: Opting out is a definite option! (Hence the question above). RE: Tier / Iceberg chart by creator - jocelyn_oui - 08 Dec 2025 Also - hats-off, friend, if you think a straight-up newb should jump into TomTame. Me my gut would say '3'. RE: Tier / Iceberg chart by creator - giggly_unit - 08 Dec 2025 (08 Dec 2025, 20:54 )jocelyn_oui Wrote: Uh - arbiter? Nobody. People vote, there is a distribution of results. They get collated. Data can be shared with everybody so they can see the ranges, etc. But yes: Opting out is a definite option! (Hence the question above). I can see the good intention there, but afaik the system has not been invented yet, that allows democratic votes on the internet to be truely honest, unbiased and not corrupted. Maybe polymarket, but that can also be bought easily. Could even lead to a black market if such a list gained any traction. RE: Tier / Iceberg chart by creator - jocelyn_oui - 08 Dec 2025 (08 Dec 2025, 21:21 )giggly_unit Wrote:(08 Dec 2025, 20:54 )jocelyn_oui Wrote: Uh - arbiter? Nobody. People vote, there is a distribution of results. They get collated. Data can be shared with everybody so they can see the ranges, etc. But yes: Opting out is a definite option! (Hence the question above). What I wrote above was throwing up a googledoc, names in col A, Whoever is ranking take a free column, write your forum nick if you want, anon if you want. Super lightweight, I would envision would take 5m for someone to fill out. If you've spent 10 seconds assessing a single tist you've spent too long. Examples / Rough categories: 5: Purposefully and stated wants to mentally damage someone. Child porn / beastiality / red room shit - that category 4: Stated unethical. Challenging. Known cases of fucking people up. Also includes findom. 3: Consentually unethical. Very explicit and visceral. My model here is tomtame (for the record I'm all the way in) BarbaCojePutitas' would for me be somewhere betw 2-3 2: Nikki Fatale 1: Basic Bambis. RE: Tier / Iceberg chart by creator - jocelyn_oui - 08 Dec 2025 A few more of mine: Samantha Sez, MsDominica, Goddess Gracie: 3 (I think 3's my sweetspot). RE: Tier / Iceberg chart by creator - jocelyn_oui - 08 Dec 2025 Shoutout to Bellmar's curses too (swoon) RE: Tier / Iceberg chart by creator - giggly_unit - 08 Dec 2025 Is this motivated by any government or NGO effort by chance? Or are you doing this on your own accord to protect others? RE: Tier / Iceberg chart by creator - jocelyn_oui - 08 Dec 2025 lol wow - motivated by self-interest. I've seen a couple that potentially scare me - want to know if they're legit loaded or paper tigers. RE: Tier / Iceberg chart by creator - jocelyn_oui - 08 Dec 2025 Besides - anything in that cat5 would be fiction / protected / not criminal anyway, no? That cannibal cop from years ago precedent? RE: Tier / Iceberg chart by creator - giggly_unit - 09 Dec 2025 sorry that happened to you, all the best for your project. |