Like Ra's Naughty Forum

Full Version: Like a dog in the mud
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Instructions for you alone

1°) Bend your RIGHT leg and lock it folded with a belt or rope
2°) Bend your LEFT leg and lock it folded with a belt or rope
3°) Put a chain with a padlock around your neck (the chain will not tighten, so there is no risk of strangulation).
4°) Put the padlock keys and handcuffs in a plastic (not glass) box.
5°) Throw the box into a pool of sticky mud.
6°) Put the handcuffs on your neck chain and close them on your wrists.

TO FREE YOURSELF
- You will have to walk like a dog to get the box with the keys out of the mud.
- Come back dry WITHOUT opening the box because if the keys fall into the mud you might not find them.

VARIABLE if no mud
Wet grass is also good, but you have to leave the box with the keys much further away.

DOMINATION
This scenario can be done by a Master or Mistress who wants to watch their submissive play the hunting dog.

WITH ME to look after the keys.
If you come on holiday to my fetish lodge and YOU want to experience it as a submissive dog, be aware that there are places with mud and grass on my property. REAL
(18 Oct 2024, 07:14 )Gitefétichistes Wrote: [ -> ]3°) Put a chain with a padlock around your neck (the chain will not tighten, so there is no risk of strangulation).

[...]

6°) Put the handcuffs on your neck chain and close them on your wrists.

Only one of those two statements can be true at once.
Not sure I understand, but if there is chain around your neck and the two ends are locked together with a padlock, I really don’t see how the chain tightens as chain doesn’t expand or contacts.

However, if the cuffs or and extra chain runs down your back too the cuffs, then the pulling on the neck chain will definitely cut you off.

But if the cuffs are in front, I think you’ll be okay.

Or am I missing something?
(30 Oct 2024, 18:57 )Pseudo_Sissy Wrote: [ -> ]Only one of those two statements can be true at once.
Not, if you put them in front of you, or the neck chain is long and loose. But I would prefer to lock the handcuffs to the waist chain, or to the crotch-chain (like crotch-rope).
I insist and specify for safety

- If the chain is not tight, it will not strangle the person. It is NOT breath control

- For safety, I advise (and practice as indicated) putting the handcuffs on in front. That way, if you fall, you can protect your face.
(30 Oct 2024, 21:05 )Like Ra Wrote: [ -> ]Not, if you put them in front of you, or the neck chain is long and loose

Even if you attach your hands (or other limbs) to non-tightening loop of rope/chain around your neck, it's a pretty risky scenario.

Even if you only pull to the front, unless you have a solid ring around your neck and pull perfectly forward, it will create side pressure on your neck (and arteries). If you pull at a loop, it wants to become 1D which your neck is very much not.

Sure, the risk is SmAlL if you have the hands attached in front, the forces aren't high and as long as you are conscious, you can keep yourself from pulling in wrong ways.

You could say the same thing about attaching the hands behind, but it gets much more difficult to keep them from pulling on your neck and once you don't, the result is much worse.

Definitely wouldn't call this safe for "struggle to free yourself" scenarios such as the one in question here (however hot it actually sounds to me, ngl).
(31 Oct 2024, 13:54 )Pseudo_Sissy Wrote: [ -> ]
(30 Oct 2024, 21:05 )Like Ra Wrote: [ -> ]Not, if you put them in front of you, or the neck chain is long and loose

Even if you attach your hands (or other limbs) to non-tightening loop of rope/chain around your neck, it's a pretty risky scenario.

Even if you only pull to the front, unless you have a solid ring around your neck and pull perfectly forward, it will create side pressure on your neck (and arteries). If you pull at a loop, it wants to become 1D which your neck is very much not.

Sure, the risk is SmAlL if you have the hands attached in front, the forces aren't high and as long as you are conscious, you can keep yourself from pulling in wrong ways.

You could say the same thing about attaching the hands behind, but it gets much more difficult to keep them from pulling on your neck and once you don't, the result is much worse.

Definitely wouldn't call this safe for "struggle to free yourself" scenarios such as the one in question here (however hot it actually sounds to me, ngl).

You're right, with self-bonding, you have to be careful about the risk of strangulation.


The trick I'm indicating is:
- Hands in front
- The chain is not tightened around the neck. It just can't be removed.
- The scenario doesn't involve attaching it to anything that could pull on the chain. So, even if the person becomes unwell, there won't be any strong pull because they'll be lying on the floor.

I've used this principle X times as part of the animalisation games and during the Espace game or bondage walking that I organise for our fetish house. People don't pull on the chain. 
During the Espace game or bondage walking, the fact that the hands are in front protects the face in the event of a fall.
In this video made yesterday, you can clearly see the principle of the chain around the neck.
It's not in the mud, it's during a feminised space-game self-bondage.

https://fessestivites.com/media/209196