To those who consider themselves 'straight' fetishists.

11 Replies, 5155 Views

Is this sexy?

 2.jpg   

Discuss 😊
Sexy? No.

Type of Art? Yes.
That specific image? No, not sexy to me.

But that type of image? Yes, can be very sexy, but it needs to have the elements I like.

MJ
I'd consider myself a straight fetishist but I have to admit, that does look hot and I'll take whatever she's offering.

I think sexy is less sexual, if that makes any sense.
I consider myself a straight fetishist too, i.e., I don't see a "hot guy" and get excited, but put a reasonably fit guy in pantyhose, lycra, heels, encased, bound, etc. and schwing! I would do some seriously nasty things to him and let him return the favor if he wanted. This photo definitely fits into that category.
(07 Jun 2017, 00:45 )paulsanfran Wrote: I consider myself a straight fetishist too, i.e., I don't see a "hot guy" and get excited, but put a reasonably fit guy in pantyhose, lycra, heels, encased, bound, etc. and schwing! I would do some seriously nasty things to him and let him return the favor if he wanted. This photo definitely fits into that category.
I have the same thoughts/imagination, but when it will become a real situation, I think it will not be "so real" for me. 

Perhaps funta....  😇
(04 Jun 2017, 08:10 )culmor Wrote: Is this sexy?
Yes! (I've got lots of Dmitry's works, BTW)

The boy does not look overly masculine (must confess, I do not like men, sorry), but I like erections, I like tights, I like tight mini-shorts, I like girls, I like sporty figures, so yes, I find it very erotic.
(This post was last modified: 11 Jun 2017, 20:48 by Like Ra.)
I've been thinking a bit more about the answers people have given to this thread and feel the need to explore this further.

I do not find men attractive or arousing, 'gay' porn does nothing for me and I certainly cannot imagine myself in any kind of sexual relationship with another man.

And yet....

There is something I find deeply erotic about certain images that, to be crude, are all about a cock and I freely admit that these can and do feature in my fantasies! Mostly these are Futa related artwork, but even then there are some that do and some that don't... if you see what I mean.

As an example take these three images and my reaction to them:

 tumblr_odtcq7RqFS1ui1edko1_500.jpg    - Oh boy! Very sexy and certainly a stirring in the trouser department
 tumblr_ol3jff3dqm1ui1edko1_500.jpg    - nope... nothing happening here
 tumblr_omz954jodJ1ui1edko1_500.jpg    - Hubba-hubba!

The obvious commonality is that the ones I like are very 'female' whereas the one I don't is more androgynous - but why the fascination with the cock or a Futa girl (or very feminine cross-dresser/transvestite/transgender person - images of which I also find arousing, when they incorporate bondage and long nylon clad legs).

That's more difficult to explain, but I know that both I and @likera have in the past posted about the 'fantasy' of a unattached cock  (or more accurately for me its a cock and balls - its all about the fluids Blush ). Certainly I would be very interested in incorporating a programmable, semi-autonomous, unattached and fully functioning cock-like device into my play.
 flyingpenis.jpg    - an unattached cock... sort off! Look it was the best image I could find!! 😁

Now, such things as flying or independent cocks are very much a flight of fancy and simply don't exist in real life. So that leaves me with other option: a female (or very female looking) with a cock... hmmm.

There are plenty of contenders out there who could easily fit the brief but would they actually ever be more than a fantasy?  I think the answer, for me at least, is 'no' - as with many things the delight of a fantasy is that it is just that... a fantasy; with no risks or complications. I can enjoy it totally within the safety of my own imagination and that is where it will stay.... apart from when I share it with this forum.

MJ
Quote:That's more difficult to explain, but I know that both I and @likera have in the past posted about the 'fantasy' of a unattached cock (or more accurately for me its a cock and balls - its all about the fluids ). Certainly I would be very interested in incorporating a programmable, semi-autonomous, unattached and fully functioning cock-like device into my play.

Interesting that you stated that.
I've been thinking pretty much the same thing. Other than my so-called fuck-bot or humping-bot, a Bluetooth penis dildo that can pretty mimic a real cock would be fun to play with.
The only thing I can find wrong with the construction, would be keeping the juices warm and making it squirt. Also, keeping in place, because as you know the body will try to push it out.
(This post was last modified: 12 Jun 2017, 14:29 by Like Ra.)
This really is an interesting topic.
And to say it troubled me would be taking it a bit far but it's certainly intrigued me as to why some things excite me that would normally be 'gay'

I think for me the images/videos I've seen that have got me going it's normally down to the experience that is portrayed not the gender of the people involved.

Imagining myself teased in a sleepsack or other complex bondage scenario seem to be the 'thing' who is delivering the sensation does not seem important.

So for me it's all about the fatasized experience...gender neutral.

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Footwear for fetishists - your chance to vote! madjack 16 10,745 17 Oct 2014, 15:35
Last Post: madjack