Help with Content Warnings and Informed Consent

[Eros Audio]

I have just started writing hypnosis files, and I am very interested in using some of the traditional Bambi Sleep triggers. From what I have read, one major objections that people have to some of the Bambi files is that they are not transparent in warning potential subjects about content or long-term effects.

I am hoping to get some feedback and direction from the community about what kinds of things should be included as warnings or disclaimers, both for BDSM and erotic hypnosis in general and with the Bambi Sleep-style triggers specifically.

Currently, I am adding the following (adapted from online information):

Before listening, please consider if Bambi Sleep is the right for you. These files are focused on deliberate behavioral modification and can have long-lasting effects, especially if you are under 25 or very susceptible to suggestion. So please don't take the files lightly.

The following themes/suggestions in these files include: bimbofication, Bambi triggers, IQ reduction, obedience, behavior modification, erosion of boundaries/consent, amnesia play, discipline, addiction, consent violations, boundary erosion, gaslighting.

Listening to these files may cause changes in sexual identity, desire, practices, and relationships.

Are there additional warnings or statements that would be helpful to make sure that people are aware of what is included and potential risks?

[Like Ra]

I have just started writing hypnosis files,

Good! So, you decide, what goes into your files, right? What means, only you can define the possible effects?

From what I have read, one major objections that people have to some of the Bambi files is that they are not transparent

The most popular hypno files are not 100% transparent. Think of Bambi, Samantha Bandler, Kei, Pig Girl, Tom Tame. Also, Goddess Gracy, MsJ and many others, who use subliminal tracks. And that absence of transparency, "the sweet unknown", is exactly what makes such creators more attractive.

So, I would say, that it's not the transparency, what turns people off, but rather what's absolutely transparent and declared. Think of:

bimbofication, Bambi triggers, IQ reduction, obedience, behavior modification, erosion of boundaries/consent, amnesia play, discipline, addiction, consent violations, boundary erosion, gaslighting.

You can add "forced feminization", "sissification", "body modification", etc.

[Like Ra]

Aaaand welcome aboard! 😊

[Lycalopex]

My brief opinion: making this kind of file completely transparent actually detracts from the appeal and experience and people who complain about the lack of transparency should really find another file series.

[Lycalopex]

You can add "forced feminization", "sissification", "body modification", etc.

Sissification isn't actually an intended goal of the original files; they're meant to be gender-neutral and listing sissy-related effects will often turn cis women (like me, lol) away from the files because it's assumed that any file focusing on specifically "sissification" rather than "forced feminization" is going to be male/sissy-oriented.

[Eros Audio]

Aaaand welcome aboard! 😊

Thank you!  I am looking forward to it!

[Eros Audio]

My brief opinion: making this kind of file completely transparent actually detracts from the appeal and experience and people who complain about the lack of transparency should really find another file series.

Thank you for the feedback.  That was something I was wondering about as well.  I think there is a line where you can provide reasonable warnings to prevent people from unwittingly engaging in something while not spoiling the experience for those looking for something deeper and more intense.

[Eros Audio]

You can add "forced feminization", "sissification", "body modification", etc.

Sissification isn't actually an intended goal of the original files; they're meant to be gender-neutral and listing sissy-related effects will often turn cis women (like me, lol) away from the files because it's assumed that any file focusing on specifically "sissification" rather than "forced feminization" is going to be male/sissy-oriented.

Thank you, that is very helpful.  I am going to keep sissification and forced fem as their own genre.

[Like Ra]

Sissification isn't actually an intended goal of the original files;

Yes, definitely not 100% as, indeed, sissification assumes the presence of a penis 😆 However, sissification generally overlaps with feminization, forced feminization, cock obsession, power exchange, obedience, etc. And since we are talking about a new set of files, the content might be more sissyfication-oriented 😉