Shiny wetlook leotards. Shininess vs tightness. Part I
“Shiny leotards.” Sounds nice. Please pass me one. “Shiny wetlook latex-like leotards”. Even more interesting. Give me two. But stop… I like how shiny the material is. It’s probably even more glossy than polished latex. But what about wrinkles? Will it keep the form? Will it follow the curves?
If you look at these pictures (16 below), not quite. But still looks nice ;-)
Related posts:
- Shiny wetlook leotards. Shininess vs tightness. Part II
See Part I A step in the correct direction. Shiny pantyhose with shiny leotard and the latter is not buggy... - What is the fetish sport #1?
Aerobics or shiny leotards with shiny pantyhose
I mean official sports, not something like self-bondage ;-) Just to name a few: figure skating (leotards – actually, they... - Leotards and shiny pantyhose. Part I
As you may know leotards and shiny pantyhose have been my fetish since I remember myself. Recently, while searching e2dk... - Shiny pantyhose, wetlook catsuit and bad fit. Part III
See Part I and Part II. It was sunny today. Not very warm, 15°C, but the bright sun compensated the... - Stumbled upon on eBay. Shiny leotards and shiny swimsuits
Found three shops on eBay: bobsangelcat – shiny leotards, catsuits, semitransparent and water-polo swimsuits (properly modelled with shiny pantyhose) farfalinadesign...
4 Responses to “Shiny wetlook leotards. Shininess vs tightness. Part I”















Blog updates'



awesome find!! Yeah i wish they’re weren’t so many wrinkles, but what can you do
Comment :: February 15, 2010 at 08:36 :: Quote
Excellent photo set!
I can see that the ‘shiny’ Vs ‘tight’ argument is probably down to personal prefernce.
For me it’s ‘tight’ every time!
So in this picture what I see is a beautiful girl, with great legs, clad in gorgeous pantyhose (favorite colour!), let down by a wrinkled top… but still a GREAT PHOTO!
MJ
Comment :: February 15, 2010 at 12:35 :: Quote
[...] See Part I [...]
Pingback :: February 22, 2010 at 04:09 :: Quote
[...] Part I and Part II[...]
Pingback :: April 9, 2010 at 03:43 :: Quote